Notes From the Margins…

Ukraine: A Suitable Case for Treatment?

  • March 28, 2014
  • by

Good morning Ukraine, and how are you today?   I am Doctor Christine Lagarde from the IMF, and this is my assistant the European Union.       We are standing in for Doctor Putin, who is away on holiday in the Crimea at the moment.     We have examined your test results, and we regret to inform you that your prognosis is not good.

As your Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk has pointed out, you are on the ‘brink of economic and financial bankruptcy’ as a result of decades of corruption and economic stagnation.     Your currency reserves are at a critically low level and you need $35 billion over the next two years to avoid default.

You will therefore be pleased to know that the IMF has decided to offer you a $27 billion rescue package in order to help bring your country back to economic health and incorporate it fully into the international economy, and the EU will also be offering a generous 11 million euros.

As has been the case in similar situations elsewhere, this assistance will require you to undergo what the Wall Street Journal calls ‘painful budget cuts that will strain the country’s fragile economy.’       These will include the dismantling of state-owned enterprises in order to open up your economy to foreign investment, in addition to a swathe of job cuts and reductions in social provision.

As your Prime Minister has explained, this process will require any future government to ‘do difficult and unpopular things.’   Mr Yatsenyuk has already explained that spending cuts will cost 24,000 government jobs in the first instance, cuts in state pensions, higher rates of income tax, and changes to your constitution.

Our package will also require deregulation, the wholesale privatization of your coal mines, oil and gas pipelines, grain silos and other industrial assets in order to make them more attractive to Western investors, in addition to a removal of energy subsidies in order to align energy prices with current international market rates, which will result in a fifty percent hike from May 1.

We realise that these reforms may cause considerable hardship and turmoil for millions of Ukrainians, in a country where the average GDP per capita is $3,867.   As a recent report by the Institute of International Finance points out,   the adjustment program we are recommending will involve ‘ massive social and economic pain’.

But we would like to remind you that similar shock therapy has been administered in every country that we have dealt with, with highly positive results, in the former Soviet Union, in Yugoslavia, Iraq, and more recently in the European Union.

And would also like to reassure you that this pain will not be felt by everyone.   Private investors will not be affected unduly by this transformation, and the current package, as the Wall Street Journal approvingly observes,   is specifically designed to protect them from the changes that we believe are necessary to restore your economy to full health.

We understand however, that this treatment may produce negative political consequences, especially in this very volatile and unpredictable period in your country’s history, and could worsen the current political crisis and exacerbate ethnic conflict and separatist tensions.

That is why we will ensure that four million households receive some form of government assistance, and that spending cuts over the next two years are   conducted at a pace ‘commensurate with the speed of the economic recovery and protecting the vulnerable.’

If you look at the dismantling of the state in Iraq, or the bailout packages imposed on Greece and other European Union members states in recent years, you will notice how well the vulnerable have been protected.     You might, for example have read the latest report by the Catholic charity Caritas, on the impact of IMF/EU-imposed austerity on various European countries.

Among other things Caritas found that reforms designed to promote more ‘efficient’ public administration have resulted in ‘ people with disabilities and pensioners having to wait for months for their allowances and pensions because there is not enough personnel to process all the claims.’

In Greece, the report found   ‘households that could not afford heating during the winter and of some without electricity’, ‘an unprecedented lack of access to social services, including health services’ and ‘serious psychological problems‘, amongst the population, including a high rate of suicides, a 25 percent increase in homelessness, a fall in the birthrate and a rise in still births.

We hope that none of this will happen to your population.   But you must know that if there are negative side effects, we will nevertheless insist that you continue with the treatment, because there is really no other way to make you better.

Here is your prescription.   Have a very pleasant weekend.

2 Comments

  1. MartinS

    30th Mar 2014 - 10:11 am

    Matt, thanks for another great article. I see in Counterpunch and other places a narrative that goes something like: Putin was obsessed with Sochi security and was distracted. Nevertheless, his move on Crimea completely took the US by surprise. The US strategy for Ukraine was in the hands of rogue neocon elements that Obama couldn’t control, who wanted to drive a wedge between Putin and Obama. I don’t buy this. Putin would have known every last detail of the developments in Ukraine through agents agents/intercepts. Everything about Crimea looked so well-planned that it cannot have been improvised. Similarly, the block US/Europe media tsunami also appeared very well-rehearsed. I would argue that each side correctly predicted the other’s moves. The West wanted to ratchet up pressure on Putin, demonize him and isolate Russia, from the EU but especially from China. The huge worry for the US is of course the dollar, should the BRICS decide to sideline it. I believe the Russian/Chinese responses have been highly coordinated (see the estimable Pepe Escobar’s work). I wondered what your thoughts were?

    • Matt

      30th Mar 2014 - 11:48 am

      Thanks Martin. I don’t have enough information to know whether this murky business was as well-organized and pre-programmed as you suggest, though your explanation certainly sounds more plausible than the ‘rogue neocon/Putin wasn’t looking hypothesis.’ For one thing I haven’t seen any evidence to suggest that ‘rogue neocons’ wielded the kind of power that Counterpunch seems to be suggesting. At the same time it’s never entirely clear to me how governments or ‘deep state’ forces really shape events, or whether they just react to them and try to get what they can out of them. Have you got any links you can send me regarding the Russia/China angle – and other relevant links for that matter?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Me

I’m a writer, campaigner and journalist.  My latest book is The Savage Frontier: The Pyrenees in History and the Imagination (New Press/Hurst, 2018).  The Infernal Machine is where I write on politics, history, cinema and other things that interest me.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Events

  • No events

Recent Comments